Massachusetts state court rejects Kalshi preemption argument as 'overly broad,' holds federal and state regimes can coexist
Suffolk County Superior Court ruled Kalshi's sports contracts are subject to Massachusetts gaming law, rejecting Kalshi's preemption argument as overly broad and holding that federal commodities regulation can coexist with state gambling authority rather than displacing it.MoreLess
Suffolk County Superior Court ruled Kalshi's sports contracts are subject to Massachusetts gaming law, rejecting Kalshi's preemption argument as overly broad and holding that federal commodities regulation can coexist with state gambling authority rather than displacing it.
1 Jan 2026No source link on file
