Operator intelligence

Regulatory Intelligence

Track material changes in iGaming regulation, litigation, licensing, and market access without digging through fragmented source material.

Research summaries for operational planning. Verify the underlying source and obtain jurisdiction-specific legal advice before acting.

Records

110 results

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Kahnawake Gaming Commission v. Einrai Ltd. (Spinhub)

    Outcome: Revoked; no longer KGC-licensed.More

    Outcome: Revoked; no longer KGC-licensed.

    Legal question
    Outcome: Revoked; no longer KGC-licensed.

    9 Apr 2026Source: gamingcommission.ca

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Malta MGA — cancellation of Winzon Group Limited authorisation

    Outcome: Licence cancelled; penalties and ongoing compliance obligations imposed.More

    Outcome: Licence cancelled; penalties and ongoing compliance obligations imposed.

    Legal question
    Outcome: Licence cancelled; penalties and ongoing compliance obligations imposed.

    7 Apr 2026Source: mga.org.mt

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Netherlands KSA v. Fortaprime SRL

    Outcome: Fined €1,795,000.More

    Outcome: Fined €1,795,000.

    Legal question
    Outcome: Fined €1,795,000.

    10 Mar 2026Source: sbcnews.co.uk

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Netherlands KSA v. Novatech (Qbet.com/55Bet.com)

    Outcome: Fined €24,846,000.More

    Outcome: Fined €24,846,000.

    Legal question
    Outcome: Fined €24,846,000.

    10 Mar 2026Source: nltimes.nl

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    CFTC v. Kentucky

    Whether a state may tax and enforce against prediction-market platforms consistent with CEA preemption; firstMore

    Whether a state may tax and enforce against prediction-market platforms consistent with CEA preemption; first

    Action type
    declaratory
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether a state may tax and enforce against prediction-market platforms consistent with cea preemption; first cftc suit against a republican-controlled state.

    United States (Kentucky)Active2026Source: cftc.gov

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    City of Baltimore v. VGW Holdings

    Whether a municipality (rather than a state AG) can bring a consumer-protection enforcement action against mulMore

    Whether a municipality (rather than a state AG) can bring a consumer-protection enforcement action against mul

    Action type
    ag_enforcement
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether a municipality (rather than a state ag) can bring a consumer-protection enforcement action against multiple sweepstakes operators simultaneously, including a minors-marketing theory.

    United States (Maryland)Active2026Source: dicellolevitt.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Class action re: Kalshi "death carveout" clause (Khamenei market)

    Whether an undisclosed market-resolution carveout clause is enforceable against consumers who relied on the plMore

    Whether an undisclosed market-resolution carveout clause is enforceable against consumers who relied on the pl

    Action type
    class_action
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether an undisclosed market-resolution carveout clause is enforceable against consumers who relied on the platform's stated resolution criteria.

    United StatesActive2026Source: classaction.org

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Commonwealth of Kentucky v. VGW

    Whether VGW's Chumba Casino/LuckyLand Slots dual-currency model constitutes unlicensed illegal gambling underMore

    Whether VGW's Chumba Casino/LuckyLand Slots dual-currency model constitutes unlicensed illegal gambling under

    Action type
    ag_enforcement
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether vgw's chumba casino/luckyland slots dual-currency model constitutes unlicensed illegal gambling under kentucky law.

    United States (Kentucky)Active2026Source: yogonet.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Drollinger v. Sunflower Ltd. (Crown Coins Casino)

    Same as McNamara v. Sunflower — second suit against the same operator group.More

    Same as McNamara v. Sunflower — second suit against the same operator group.

    Action type
    class_action
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same as mcnamara v. sunflower — second suit against the same operator group.

    United States (Ohio)Active2026Source: umggaming.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    In re Valve Loot Box Litigation

    Whether Valve's loot box mechanics across its major titles constitute an illegal gambling enterprise under staMore

    Whether Valve's loot box mechanics across its major titles constitute an illegal gambling enterprise under sta

    Action type
    class_action
    Defendant
    operator,platform
    Legal question
    whether valve's loot box mechanics across its major titles constitute an illegal gambling enterprise under state and federal law.

    United States (Washington)Active2026Source: hbsslaw.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Kalshi v. Montana (Knudsen)

    Same core preemption question.More

    Same core preemption question.

    Action type
    declaratory
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same core preemption question.

    United States (Montana)Active2026Source: sportsbettingdime.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Kalshi, Polymarket, and CFTC v. Minnesota (SF 3432 challenge)

    Constitutionality and preemption status of Minnesota's first-in-the-nation blanket criminal ban (felony, up toMore

    Constitutionality and preemption status of Minnesota's first-in-the-nation blanket criminal ban (felony, up to

    Action type
    declaratory
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    constitutionality and preemption status of minnesota's first-in-the-nation blanket criminal ban (felony, up to 5 years/$10,000 fine) on prediction-market platforms, effective 2026-08-01.

    United States (Minnesota)Active2026Source: courthousenews.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    KalshiEX LLC v. Tennessee Sports Wagering Council

    Same core preemption question, with a rare trial-court win for Kalshi.More

    Same core preemption question, with a rare trial-court win for Kalshi.

    Action type
    appellate
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same core preemption question, with a rare trial-court win for kalshi.

    United States (Tennessee / 6th Cir.)On Appeal2026Source: gamblinginsider.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Kenya High Court judicial review — Gambling Control (Licensing) Regulations 2026

    Whether the 2026 Regulations' licensing-fee increases were validly promulgated.More

    Whether the 2026 Regulations' licensing-fee increases were validly promulgated.

    Action type
    licence_appeal
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether the 2026 regulations' licensing-fee increases were validly promulgated.

    KenyaActive2026Source: focusgn.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Krivatch v. Sweepsteaks Limited (Stake.us)

    Whether Stake.us is an unlicensed casino subject to Ohio's loss-recovery statute.More

    Whether Stake.us is an unlicensed casino subject to Ohio's loss-recovery statute.

    Action type
    class_action
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether stake.us is an unlicensed casino subject to ohio's loss-recovery statute.

    United States (Ohio)Active2026Source: gamblinginsider.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc.

    Same IGRA third-party-liability question raised in Ho-Chunk and Blue Lake Rancheria, plus an age-restriction cMore

    Same IGRA third-party-liability question raised in Ho-Chunk and Blue Lake Rancheria, plus an age-restriction c

    Action type
    individual
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same igra third-party-liability question raised in ho-chunk and blue lake rancheria, plus an age-restriction compliance gap.

    United States (New Mexico, Tribal)Active2026Source: courtlistener.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Michigan v. KalshiEX LLC

    Whether Michigan's sports-betting licensing requirement applies to event contracts.More

    Whether Michigan's sports-betting licensing requirement applies to event contracts.

    Action type
    ag_enforcement
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether michigan's sports-betting licensing requirement applies to event contracts.

    United States (Michigan)Active2026Source: michigan.gov

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Ontario AGCO fines — Relax Gaming Limited and Arrise Solutions Limited

    B2B supplier liability for its content appearing on unregulated grey-market sites accessible to Ontario playerMore

    B2B supplier liability for its content appearing on unregulated grey-market sites accessible to Ontario player

    Action type
    regulatory_enforcement
    Defendant
    supplier
    Legal question
    b2b supplier liability for its content appearing on unregulated grey-market sites accessible to ontario players.

    Canada (Ontario)Closed2026Source: covers.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    People of the State of New York v. Valve Corporation

    Whether a state AG can succeed on a gambling-promotion penal-law theory against loot boxes where private RICO/More

    Whether a state AG can succeed on a gambling-promotion penal-law theory against loot boxes where private RICO/

    Action type
    ag_enforcement
    Defendant
    operator,platform
    Legal question
    whether a state ag can succeed on a gambling-promotion penal-law theory against loot boxes where private rico/consumer suits have previously failed.

    United States (New York)Active2026Source: geekwire.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    Rhode Island v. Kalshi and Polymarket / Kalshi v. Rhode Island (dueling suits)

    Same core preemption question, notable for a venue race where each side filed within the same week.More

    Same core preemption question, notable for a venue race where each side filed within the same week.

    Action type
    declaratory
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same core preemption question, notable for a venue race where each side filed within the same week.

    United States (Rhode Island)Active2026Source: riag.ri.gov

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    State of Arizona v. KalshiEX LLC and Kalshi Trading LLC (criminal)

    Whether a state may pursue criminal charges against a CFTC-registered exchange's local operations, including fMore

    Whether a state may pursue criminal charges against a CFTC-registered exchange's local operations, including f

    Action type
    criminal
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether a state may pursue criminal charges against a cftc-registered exchange's local operations, including for election-outcome contracts specifically.

    United States (Arizona)Active2026Source: azag.gov

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. Blockratize, Inc.

    Same as the parallel Kalshi-Nevada matter, applied to Polymarket's US entities.More

    Same as the parallel Kalshi-Nevada matter, applied to Polymarket's US entities.

    Action type
    ag_enforcement
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same as the parallel kalshi-nevada matter, applied to polymarket's us entities.

    United States (Nevada)Active2026Source: docs.justia.com

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    State of Washington v. Playtika Ltd. and Aristocrat Leisure Limited

    Whether Playtika/Aristocrat's social casino apps (including Big Fish Casino and Jackpot Magic Slots) constitutMore

    Whether Playtika/Aristocrat's social casino apps (including Big Fish Casino and Jackpot Magic Slots) constitut

    Action type
    ag_enforcement
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    whether playtika/aristocrat's social casino apps (including big fish casino and jackpot magic slots) constitute illegal gambling under washington law, and whether child-targeted marketing aggravates liability.

    United States (Washington)Active2026Source: atg.wa.gov

  • Litigation matterSource checked

    United States v. Arizona

    Same preemption question as United States v. Illinois, applied to enjoin an active state criminal prosecution.More

    Same preemption question as United States v. Illinois, applied to enjoin an active state criminal prosecution.

    Action type
    declaratory
    Defendant
    operator
    Legal question
    same preemption question as united states v. illinois, applied to enjoin an active state criminal prosecution.

    United States (Arizona)Active2026Source: cftc.gov

Methodology

How these records are compiled.

Records are compiled from public regulatory, legislative, and litigation sources. Each entry keeps its original source link and its verification state, so you can see how far a record has been checked before you rely on it.

Summaries are research notes, not legal conclusions. A source-checked badge means a person opened the source on the recorded date — it is not a legal opinion, and it is not a sign-off on the operator implications.

The dataset is reviewed periodically. It is not a real-time feed and it does not claim complete coverage of any jurisdiction: treat a gap as a gap in this dataset, not as evidence that nothing has changed.

Field notes

Next step

Need this read against your own build?

A tracker tells you what moved. It does not tell you what it means for your licence, your processor, or your launch date. Bring us the jurisdictions you care about and we will work through the operational consequences with you.